Most voters (61%) now imagine the end result of this 12 months’s presidential election could have a serious impression on abortion entry on this nation, a brand new KFF Well being Monitoring Ballot discovered. The variety of voters is up 10 proportion factors from March.

The shift occurred primarily amongst Democratic and unbiased voters at a time when Vice President Harris grew to become the Democratic presidential nominee and made defending abortion entry a key a part of her marketing campaign.

Abortion is most definitely to attraction to feminine Democratic voters of childbearing age (underneath 50). About one in 5 (21%) on this group cites abortion as their prime voting subject.

Democratic feminine voters of childbearing age overwhelmingly (90%) say the presidential election could have a serious impression on abortion entry — up 31 proportion factors from six months in the past. The overwhelming majority (93%) of this group of voters say abortion must be authorized in all or most instances.

Amongst voters, Vice President Harris has a big benefit over former President Trump relating to who they belief to do a greater job on abortion (53% vs. 34%). That’s a bigger lead on this subject than President Biden had on an analogous subject earlier this 12 months earlier than dropping out of the race.

Vice President Harris additionally has a smaller edge on confidence to handle well being care prices (48% vs. 39%). Impartial voters give Harris a good greater edge on well being care prices.

In the meantime, former President Trump holds a big belief benefit amongst voters throughout the board on two key non-health care points: the economic system and inflation (52% vs. 37%) and immigration and border safety (54% vs. 36%). Independents additionally give former President Trump the higher hand on these points.

Of all well being points, voters are most eager about candidates addressing prices

Forward of tonight’s presidential debate, voters are indicating that well being care prices are the difficulty they need to focus on most with former President Trump and Vice President Harris. This probably displays broader issues concerning the economic system and inflation, which stay the highest subject amongst voters.

Amongst Republicans and Republican-leaning independents, almost half (45%) say they most need former President Trump to speak about well being care prices, with solutions together with prescription drug prices and insurance coverage premiums. The same share of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents (42%) say they most need Vice President Harris to speak about well being care prices.

Different findings embody:

• Amongst all voters, six in ten (61%) say they might favor a federal legislation restoring a nationwide proper to abortion, much like what existed underneath Roe vs. Wade than leaving it as much as the states to determine whether or not abortion is authorized or not (39%). Within the 10 states the place voters might determine on abortion initiatives, voters favor a federal legislation over leaving it as much as the states by an analogous margin (62% vs. 38%).
• Amongst Democratic ladies voters underneath 50, the overwhelming majority (90%) say they assist a federal legislation restoring the appropriate to abortion nationwide, much like what existed earlier than the Supreme Courtroom's 2022 choice to strike down abortion rights. Roe vs. Wade precedent.
• When requested immediately about these points, voters say it is crucial that presidential candidates deal with abortion (84%), entry to contraception (79%), and in vitro fertilization (IVF) (57%) through the marketing campaign. A minimum of three-quarters of Democratic voters say it is crucial that candidates deal with every of those points, as do most unbiased voters. Most Republican voters additionally say it is crucial that candidates deal with abortion and entry to contraception, however lower than half say the identical about IVF.

The survey, designed and analyzed by pollsters at KFF, was performed August 26 to September 4, 2024, on-line and by phone amongst a nationally consultant pattern of 1,312 U.S. adults, together with 1,084 registered voters, in English and Spanish. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 4 proportion factors for the complete pattern and amongst registered voters. Outcomes primarily based on different subgroups could have the next margin of sampling error.